By Theresa Schliep
Attacks on the Planned Parenthood Federation of America are not solely attacks on the organization, but also on women across the nation.
This past year, there have been movements, largely governed by Republican congressmen, to stop subsidizing the sexual health organization. Republicans have justified these efforts with the claims that through taxpayer money, Planned Parenthood maintains an abortion factory and profits off of such services.
These arguments are not only erroneous, but are also malicious, threatening to endanger the health of thousands of women who otherwise would not have access to affordable healthcare.
Planned Parenthood supplies a multitude of services to women, which are not restricted to abortion. This includes tests for sexually transmitted diseases, access to contraceptives, cancer screenings and prevention, family planning and other health services. These services grossly outnumber the abortions performed at Planned Parenthood clinics across the country. Only about three percent of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are abortions.
If defunding the organization is a moral crusade against abortions, then Republicans are fighting the wrong fight. Not only are very few of the services provided by the nonprofit abortion related, but Planned Parenthood cannot use any government funding for abortion services.
A moral crusade would not threaten the healthcare of women in the lowest strata of the socioeconomic fabric of this country. Planned Parenthood largely caters to lower income and rural women. Most private clinics do not accept Medicaid because it is substantially insignificant in compensating for expenses used to run their practices. Nearly half of its patients rely on Medicaid to access the healthcare, according to Planned Parenthood.
Decreasing the number of abortions does not come from restricting access to abortions. Accessibility to contraceptives is irrefutably the most essential component of “preventing abortions.” And Planned Parenthood’s 2013-2014 annual fiscal year report reveals that a startling 34 percent of their services involve providing contraceptives.
Republicans consider videos of Planned Parenthood staff discussing the donations of fetal tissue damning in this moral crusade. Some consider this perfectly legal practice disgusting, and videos released by the Center for Medical Progress, an anti-abortion organization, might disturb viewers. But a forensic experts panel called Fusion GPS reviewed the videos and denied their validity, arguing they were largely altered and missing large portions of time in order to mislead viewers into believing that the organization produces fetuses to sell for profit. Fusion GPS considers these videos to be so misleading that they would not hold up in a court of law.
Again, if Republicans defund Planned Parenthood because of the legal donations of fetal tissue, they are fighting the wrong fight. According to the organization, only one percent of clinics are permitted to donate fetal tissue.
If we are working with the assumption that congressional Republicans are logical politicians, it cannot be an ethical war against the healthcare service, but a political one.
A political war is not surprising. In 2013, a gridlocked Congress could not agree on a budget bill because of bickering over the Affordable Care Act, charmingly nicknamed Obamacare. This shutdown furloughed all non-essential government personnel. Republicans were accused of holding the government hostage because of their disdain for the healthcare bill.
In 2015, we again see efforts made by House Republicans to defund the federal government, this time if Planned Parenthood continues to receive government funding.
This current campaign season appears to be a time of party alignment and radicalization, when liberals become more liberal and conservatives become more conservative. Perhaps, then, Republicans are catering to the most conservative of the conservative, those who deny the freedom of choice to women, even in cases of rape and incest. But this radicalization will come to hurt those running for president in the popular election, when people recall Ben Carson’s comparisons of abortion to slavery or Carly Fiorina references a completely imaginary video in which a fetus’s brain is harvested.
If this is neither an effective moral crusade nor an effective political war, then what are the efforts made by Republicans to defund Planned Parenthood? If nothing else, they are attacks on the marginalized women in America. Some women can afford to go to private clinics to obtain reproductive services, but many others rely on Planned Parenthood for their health services.
This perspective is not unique. A quick search on the Internet reveals a plethora of valid news sources that reflect the same view. How many editorials, research articles and professional testimonies must we publish to establish the heinous nature of these efforts? When will we deny personal bias and subjective morality, and instead, accept objective scientific facts?
Theresa Schliep, FCRH ’19, is undecided in her major from Point Pleasant Beach, New Jersey.
Brien Schliep • Nov 6, 2015 at 7:38 pm
As her parents, we are proud that our daughter has the intellect and courage to address an important issue facing women in our society. In your narrow minded response you are quick to point out that Margaret Sanger espoused views that, today, would be considered controversial or inappropriate. It is interesting that you point out Sanger’s positions from the early 20th century implying that the Planned Parenthood organization of today holds the same views. It is akin to comparing the Catholic churches position on Protestantism or Islam from the same time period to today, which is markedly different (otherwise know as “evolved”). Yes, the Catholic church is against abortion, however the percentage of lay Catholics who are pro-life and those who are pro-choice are about even in the United States. Since the Jesuit community prides itself on intellectual rigor and debate, I would hope that all Fordham students, faculty, and alumni would encourage the type of discussion our daughter has raised in her opinion piece. For reference, my wife and I were raised in the Catholic faith and attended parochial grammar school, high school, and I attended Villanova University. We are very aware of the churches teaching and positions. We see hope in our current Pope for an increase in the Churches ability to be introspective and less judgmental. You are the one who should be ashamed for passing judgement on Theresa because her views differ from yours.
Kate • Nov 6, 2015 at 1:12 am
Eugene White = Fordham Fail
Eugene A. White • Oct 29, 2015 at 12:26 pm
As a Fordham Alumni in high standing, I am appalled by your column and the defense of Planned Parenthood. You overlook the abortion culture which it promotes, that I might remind you, is against Catholic teaching. Secondly, Margaret Sanger, it’s founder, was a racist and promoted the PP mantra to eradicate “black babies”, Hello ! I am sad to think that Fordham students would hold these murderous views. You should be ashamed of yourself and likewise your parents.
Victoria • Nov 5, 2015 at 9:00 pm
I am saddened that a Fordham Alumni of such “high standing” would attempt to silence any debate on the issue of Planned Parenthood in such a manner. Fordham students are not required to accept the tenants of Catholic teaching in order to attend the university, and the Fordham community should value and encourage diversity of opinion within its population. Additionally, I think you have missed the central argument of this piece- that Planned Parenthood is actually one of the most successful organizations in preventing abortions because a significant portion of its resources are directed towards contraceptives meant to prevent unintended pregnancies. You should be ashamed of your inability to entertain differing opinions and of your complete disregard for the Fordham motto “wisdom and learning.”